IDLive^® Face
Passive Facial Liveness Detection

Fight Face Recognition Spoofing

The use of facial recognition for authentication is becoming increasingly prevalent — especially on mobile devices. But between easy access to images on social media and advances in digital and print image resolution, biometric systems have security gaps that fraudsters can exploit to successfully spoof a facial recognition system. These spoofs, called presentation attacks, include printed photos, cutout masks, digital and video replay attacks, and 3D masks.

Learn more about IDLive Face

What is Facial Liveness Detection?

Facial liveness has emerged as a way to fight fraud and ensure the integrity of face biometrics as a means of authentication or identity verification. Whereas face recognition can accurately answer the question “Is this the right person?” it doesn’t answer the question, “Is this a real person?”. This is the role of liveness detection.

Facial liveness works with facial recognition to determine if a biometric sample is being captured from a living subject who is present at the point of capture. As such, it stops fraudsters from using presentation attacks to spoof a facial recognition system.

IDLive Face: A New Generation of Liveness for Face Recognition

The benefit of liveness is improved security and fraud detection. The benefit of ID R&D’s passive face liveness is that it is both secure and easy to use. Whereas other products add extra steps and time to the liveness check, IDLive Face is imperceptible to customers who don’t even know it’s happening. And, the software gives no clues to fraudsters on how to beat it. Because passive liveness is less confusing for users, abandonment rates are greatly reduced and less human intervention is needed.

IDLive Face is the world’s first liveness product to identify spoofing attempts based on the same selfie used for facial matching and NO user participation — no smiling, blinking, head-turning, lights flashing, or moving the camera. This unique single image liveness detection approach is fast, accurate, and doesn’t require any capture-side software. The product uses patent-pending methodologies and a Deep Neural Network (DNN) based approach that examines different elements of the image to detect artifacts that help distinguish between a photo of a live person and a presentation attack. Read the single image facial liveness tech brief.

Fast
Takes less than one second; unique single image approach uses the same selfie taken for facial recognition to determine liveness

Frictionless
Single image approach requires absolutely no participation for a better user experience; improves automation rates and reduces customer abandonment

Flexible
Works with all modern smart devices and web cameras. Available as an SDK or Docker for deployment in your data center or private cloud. On-device option available. Stores no data and offers superior scalability using a web services architecture.

Accurate
iBeta/NIST Level 1 and Level 2 PAD Compliant for iOS and Android with a perfect score. The software powers millions of liveness checks monthly.

Works for Everyone, Everywhere
ID R&D invests heavily in creating algorithms that deliver unbiased results across demographics including race, gender, and age.

Cost Efficient
Reduces infrastructure costs, unlike other solutions that require high bandwidth internet connections and large-scale server deployments to process video.

Want to learn more about liveness detection for facial recognition?

ID R&D leads the industry in addressing demographic bias in liveness detection.

The first independent evaluation of a facial liveness detection product by an accredited biometrics lab finds that IDLive Face exhibits fairness in target demographics, including gender, age group, and race.

Letter of Confirmation
IDLive Face Exhibits Fairness

White Paper: Mitigating Demographic Bias in Facial Presentation Attack Detection

In real work operation, supporting millions of banking transactions a month, one of our customers migrated from an active face liveness technique to ID R&D passive liveness, and completion rates increased from 60% to 95%+. This was in one of the more challenging production environments with a very wide range of operating parameters.

On the back of the improved liveness success rates experienced (faster, more accurate, much higher completion rates with much less attempts) the customer expanded their use of the system and their business dependency on ID R&D liveness for a much broader digital engagement on a long-term basis.

Large global partner

Make the switch from Active to Passive Facial Liveness

Understanding passive vs. active facial liveness is crucial. Most of today’s facial liveness technologies are “active”, requiring users to blink, turning their heads or move their phone back and forth. This results in three issues: First, fraudsters can present a photo with cut out with eye holes, use a mask or show a video to trick the system. Second, challenge-response techniques put attackers on alert that they are being checked. And lastly, active methods create friction that slows the authentication process, increases abandon rates and diminishes the overall user experience.

The team at ID R&D has worked relentlessly to ensure you don’t have to sacrifice usability for security. Customers and partners who have made the switch from active to passive facial liveness, report significant reduction in abandonment, lower false rejections of real users, and highly accurate presentation attack detection.

The idea of liveness relative to biometrics dates back to the early 2000s. Prior to AI-driven liveness detection, companies relied on humans to perform liveness checks. For example, during remote onboarding, customers would be required to show their photo ID on a video call to validate the physical presence of the person in the ID. Of course, this process was slow, costly, and error prone.

Friction in Active Liveness The technology behind liveness detection is based on the recognition of physiological information as a sign of life. Historically, liveness algorithms have been trained to identify head movements, dilation of a subject’s pupils, changes in expression, and other physical responses.

The first generation of facial liveness technology is referred to as “active.” Active liveness detection relies on the user’s movements in response to challenges such as nodding, blinking, smiling, or correctly positioning one’s face in a frame. While the technology can be effective at detecting a spoof, it introduces friction into a verification process that was largely desirable for its ability to remove friction and is less secure as fraudsters have learned how to fool these systems. The pursuit of an easier solution, facilitated by increased access to training data for better machine learning, led to a new generation of “passive” liveness detection.

Passive liveness is fundamentally different from active in that it requires no action by the user. As such, active liveness is impractical for use cases with frequent login. The friction also has a negative impact on new customer acquisition, with companies reporting abandonment rates as high as 50% when using active liveness.

However, there are additional differences to be aware of when comparing the two approaches.

Passive Liveness

Active Liveness

User Experience

Requires no action by the user, which results in less friction and lower user abandonment during processes such as remote customer onboarding.

Requires users to respond to “challenges” that add time and effort to the process.

Software Requirements

Some approaches require installing a software component on a device; others do not.

Active solutions usually require installing software on the device.

Image analysis

This varies depending on the passive approach. Analysis may be based on a single image with processing in near real time.

Requires analysis of multiple images or frames of video to detect movement.

Bandwidth Requirements

May use the same selfie taken for facial recognition, resulting in no incremental traffic to the server.

May require additional data to be exchanged between the user’s device and a server-based solution. This is a problem in geographies where bandwidth is scarce or expensive.

Speed

The speed of a passive liveness check depends on the method used. Near real time is possible.

Active liveness always increases user effort, resulting in a longer liveness check.

Robustness to Spoofing

Passive methods have the advantage of “security through obscurity.” They are generally more immune to spoofing attacks because the fraudster doesn’t have clues as to how to defeat the liveness check. In fact, they won’t even know it’s happening.

Active systems provide fraudsters with instructions that can be “reverse engineered” to attack and defeat the liveness check. Known techniques to break them include using a simple 2D mask with cut out eyes or animation software to mimic head movements, smiling, and blinking.

Proven Compliant with ISO 30107-3
Standard for Robustness

A few passive liveness solutions have passed iBeta Level 1 and Level 2 testing and are compliant with ISO 30107-3. Additionally, ID R&D has passed Level 1 and Level 2 testing with a single image approach to liveness detection.

Multiple solutions are iBeta Level 1 and Level 2 compliant or conformant. Note that there is no difference between iBeta “certified” and “compliant.” (link https://www.ibeta.com/iso-30107-3-presentation-attack-detection-confirmation-letters/)

A variety of techniques are used to perform a passive liveness check, ranging from analyzing a selfie image to capturing a video, to flashing lights on the subject. These passive liveness approaches have different impacts on the user experience and processing as outlined in the following table.

APPROACH

PROS

CONS

Flashing lights on the user

The user does not need to respond to any challenges or move.

The device must be held steady
The process takes time
It fails in bright sunlight
Users may not tolerate the strobing lights

Capturing a short video

The user does not need to respond to any challenges or move.

The video takes time to capture
Software may need to be downloaded to the device
Passive observation relies on micro-mimics and small movements, which may be hard to capture

Examining a single selfie image

Uses the same selfie used for facial matching and requires no extra effort by the user.
Because only one image is needed, bandwidth requirements are low and processing is fast.

No additional software download is required on the user side for image capture.

Requires a server-side component

Using a hardware assisted approach (e.g. depth measuring)

Requires no extra effort by the user.
Because only a few images are needed, the requirements on bandwidth are acceptable in most cases.

Requires expensive client-side hardware
Requires a server-side component
Uses more CPU power

How can facial liveness be determined based on a single image? It starts with the ability to use the same selfie image that is used by the biometric and facial recognition system. As such, no special hardware or additional software is needed for image collection. If the quality of the selfie is good enough for facial recognition, it can be used for the liveness check.

The other enabling factor is use of Deep Neural Networks that process the selfie image to detect artifacts that help distinguish between a photo of a live person and a presentation attack. ID R&D has built a unique DNN-based approach to liveness detection that underpins the single image technique.

The process takes less than one second and looks like this:

User takes a selfie. The selfie image is used by the facial recognition system to determine a match. The same selfie image is used for the liveness check.

Deep Neural Networks and proprietary algorithms are used to analyze the image for liveness.

Each of the neural networks examines a different element of the image to detect artifacts that help distinguish between a photo of a live person and a presentation attack. Knowing what the neural networks should examine and how to combine the neural networks is proprietary information. This is the “magic”!

The software fuses the output of these neural networks to produce a liveness score.

IDLive Face is the only single frame passive liveness product to achieve iBeta Levels 1 and 2 ISO/IEC 30107-3 presentation attack detection (PAD) compliance with a perfect score. Read more about iBeta here.

IDLive Face Features

Passive UX – no action required
No special capture software required
Single image analysis (vs multiple frames or video)
Background implicit method of attack detection
Identification of natural face movements (when available)
Level 1 and 2 ISO 30107-3 compliance; tested with both iOS and Android
Cross channel input: mobile, web, stand-alone devices

READ WHITEPAPER

IDLive Face Benefits

Strengthen the security of mobile and web authentication
Eliminate friction by working in the background with no active participation from the user
Prevents fraudsters from knowing liveness detection is occurring
Ease remote customer onboarding and improve identity proofing processes
Reduce fraudulent accounts and account takeovers
Zero extra data to transmit, reducing network traffic and associated costs
No need for high bandwidth internet connections and large-scale server deployments

Passive Facial Liveness Use Cases

ID R&D passive liveness is the choice of leading identity and access management vendors, onboarding and KYC providers, access control companies, IoT developers, and enterprise customers worldwide. IDLive Face is deployed in 50 countries, supporting and millions of liveness checks each month. The product is used in a range of use cases across financial, government, travel, healthcare, building management and more.

Remote customer onboarding

Mobile and online face biometric authentication

Two-Factor Authentication

Physical biometric access systems

IDLive Face is packaged as an SDK and as a Docker with a simple RESTful API. Additionally, a mobile SDK (beta) is now offered for FIDO-compliant, on-device deployment. IDLive Face Mobile SDK runs on Android and iOS.

Don't deploy face recognition for authentication without passive facial liveness. IDLive Face can be integrated with any face recognition software to prevent presentation attacks.

Core Voice Biometrics

Packaged Voice Biometric Solutions

IDLive^® Face
Passive Facial Liveness Detection

Fight Face Recognition Spoofing

Learn more about IDLive Face

What is Facial Liveness Detection?

IDLive Face: A New Generation of Liveness for Face Recognition

Want to learn more about liveness detection for facial recognition?

ID R&D leads the industry in addressing demographic bias in liveness detection.

Letter of Confirmation
IDLive Face Exhibits Fairness

White Paper: Mitigating Demographic Bias in Facial Presentation Attack Detection

Make the switch from Active to Passive Facial Liveness

The Evolution of Facial Liveness Detection

Differences Between Passive and Active Liveness

Passive Liveness

Active Liveness

User Experience

Software Requirements

Image analysis

Bandwidth Requirements

Speed

Robustness to Spoofing

Proven Compliant with ISO 30107-3
Standard for Robustness

Approaches to Passive Liveness

APPROACH

PROS

CONS

Flashing lights on the user

Capturing a short video

Examining a single selfie image

Using a hardware assisted approach (e.g. depth measuring)

Single Image Passive Facial Liveness Explained

IDLive Face Features

IDLive Face Benefits

Passive Facial Liveness Use Cases

Don't deploy face recognition for authentication without passive facial liveness. IDLive Face can be integrated with any face recognition software to prevent presentation attacks.

Core Voice Biometrics

Packaged Voice Biometric Solutions

IDLive® Face Passive Facial Liveness Detection

Fight Face Recognition Spoofing

Learn more about IDLive Face

What is Facial Liveness Detection?

IDLive Face: A New Generation of Liveness for Face Recognition

Want to learn more about liveness detection for facial recognition?

ID R&D leads the industry in addressing demographic bias in liveness detection.

Letter of Confirmation IDLive Face Exhibits Fairness

White Paper: Mitigating Demographic Bias in Facial Presentation Attack Detection

Make the switch from Active to Passive Facial Liveness

The Evolution of Facial Liveness Detection

Differences Between Passive and Active Liveness

Passive Liveness

Active Liveness

User Experience

Software Requirements

Image analysis

Bandwidth Requirements

Speed

Robustness to Spoofing

Proven Compliant with ISO 30107-3 Standard for Robustness

Approaches to Passive Liveness

APPROACH

PROS

CONS

Flashing lights on the user

Capturing a short video

Examining a single selfie image

Using a hardware assisted approach (e.g. depth measuring)

Single Image Passive Facial Liveness Explained

IDLive Face Features

IDLive Face Benefits

Passive Facial Liveness Use Cases

Don't deploy face recognition for authentication without passive facial liveness. IDLive Face can be integrated with any face recognition software to prevent presentation attacks.

IDLive^® Face
Passive Facial Liveness Detection

Letter of Confirmation
IDLive Face Exhibits Fairness

Proven Compliant with ISO 30107-3
Standard for Robustness